AI automated weapon selection

Never again shoot a million dollar missile at a thousand dollar drone.

When a base comes under attack, every radar and sensor floods one operator with data, and that person has seconds to pick the right response. Indragni makes the call for them: it reads each incoming threat and recommends the cheapest weapon that will stop it, in real time, before a person could finish reading the screen.

Test it out How it works
Minimal Force
$500 per stop
Maximum Force
$150,000 per stop
The difference
300x cheaper, same result
Test the simulator

Watch it match the right weapon to each threat, and keep going when it loses weapons.

Threats approach your base (the gold marker), while your defensive weapon positions (the teal markers) intercept them. Indragni's Matching System gives each threat the cheapest weapon that can stop it, and saves the expensive interceptors for the threats that actually need them. Switch to the Current System to see how it usually goes today: the expensive shot gets fired no matter what is coming in, and the bill climbs fast.

Flip this and watch the cost jump
Five real threat types
Click a weapon to disable it
Indragni, this run
Spent$0
Magazine26/26
Through0
Casualties0
SAME THREATS
TWO APPROACHES
Current System, same threats
Spent$0
Magazine26/26
Through0
Casualties0
Money spent
$0
Saved vs the Current System
0%
Threats that got through6/6 weapons
0
Interceptor magazine
26/26
Time to decision
0.0s
Casualties0 friendly lost
0
no personnel losses
Decisions, live
Indragni's read on each call
Right call. This threat was worth the round fired.
Overkill. A much cheaper weapon would have stopped it.
01 / What it actually does

Three jobs. That is the whole product.

Named for two old ideas that fit it perfectly: Indra, the sky-watcher with a thousand eyes, and Agni, fire aimed exactly where it is needed. Seeing, and answering, working as one.

Job one / the eye
It combines what everything sees into one picture
Five sensors might each spot the same drone and report it separately. The software figures out that is one drone, not five, and gives everyone the same clean view of what is actually out there.
Job two / the fire
It picks the cheapest weapon that will work
A slow cheap drone does not need a $150,000 missile. A jammer or a gun handles it. A fast cruise missile does need the expensive shot. The software makes that call for every threat, in real time, faster than a person can. That is the whole business: you stop wasting expensive missiles on cheap targets.
Job three / the net
It keeps working when parts get destroyed
Because it runs across every position instead of from one control center, knocking a few out does not break it. The surviving positions automatically take over the threats the dead ones were handling.
02 / The problem is real

This is not hypothetical. It is happening now, and it is draining magazines and budgets.

In the Red Sea and over the Gulf, defenders have been answering thousand dollar drones with million dollar interceptors. The numbers below are from public disclosures and defense reporting.

$2.1M
Cost of a single SM-2 interceptor. The US Navy fired roughly 120 of them defending Red Sea shipping.
US Navy disclosure, Jan 2025, via RAND
~$2,000
What a one-way attack drone can cost to build. Some run to $20,000, still a rounding error against the interceptor.
Red Sea reporting, RAND and Responsible Statecraft
200+
Missiles fired to repel Houthi attacks since Nov 2023, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.
US Navy disclosure, Jan 2025, via RAND
~200x
Cost ratio of a Patriot PAC-3 shot (about $4M) against a Shahed-type drone (about $20K).
CSIS cost-exchange analysis
We did not say this. They did.

The people running these engagements have been blunt about the math.

Real, public statements about the cost problem Indragni is built to fix. Not endorsements of us, just the reality of the fight.

Using a $3 million missile to down a $50,000 drone is "not a good exchange ratio."
Gen. James Hecker
Commander, US Air Forces in Europe
Public remarks, via CRS and defense press
US officials have described intercepting cheap drones with costly missiles as being on the wrong side of the cost curve.
US defense officials
On counter-drone operations, CENTCOM
Reporting, Business Insider
Swarm attacks of a hundred-plus cheap drones make per-unit intercept economics catastrophic for the defender.
Jamey Jacob
Dir., Counter-UAS Center of Excellence, Oklahoma State
Paraphrased, Industrial Equipment News
03 / Why it matters

Cheap drones are winning wars because defenders answer them with expensive missiles.

  • We do not build weapons
    The base already owns the sensors and the weapons. We bring software that makes them work together and choose wisely. Nothing to manufacture, nothing that explodes.
  • It plugs into what they already have
    The Army asked for software that snaps onto its open systems. Indragni is exactly that layer: it rides on top of any sensor or weapon instead of locking them to one vendor.
  • It proves itself before a shot is fired
    The whole thing can be shown in a simulation like the one above, so a small team can win its first contract without ever touching live hardware.

One incoming wave, two ways to answer it

The Current System$0
The Indragni Matching System$0
What you save, same outcome$0
These numbers are running live from the demo above. One picture, two costs, the base is defended either way. That single comparison is the entire pitch.
04 / Indragni Industries

Somebody has to decide what shoots what.

Right now that somebody is a person under pressure, working from screens that do not talk to each other. The same brain that fixes it on a base fixes it at an airport, a stadium, or a fleet. Start small: one sensor, one screen, one clear demo.

Run the demo again Get the briefing